Skip to main content
· 2/21/1985

Yurina v. State

Citations

  • 474 N.E.2d 93
  • 1985 Ind. LEXIS 745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]o properly preserve an issue for appellate review, one must state with reasonable specificity the grounds for his objection while before the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pivarnik, Givan, Debruler, Hunter, Prentice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.