New York Court of Appeals· 11/23/1993
Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co.
Citations
- 626 N.E.2d 29
- 82 N.Y.2d 457
- 605 N.Y.S.2d 213
- 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 3941
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that § 198 was intended “to afford procedural rules, including costs and cost-related remedies, to apply in actions brought for wage claims created under the substantive provisions of Labor Law article 6”
- “Indeed, by its terms, § 198(3) applies only to an action to recover upon a liability imposed by this article; it therefore does not supply a freestanding right to relief.”
- “the intent of [§ 198(l-a) ] is that • the attorney’s fees remedy provided therein is limited to wage claims based upon violations of one or more of the substantive provisions of Labor Law [Ajrticle 6”
- “the statutory remedy of an award of attorney’s fees ... as well as the liquidated damages remedy where a willful failure to pay wages has been established, are limited to actions for wage claims founded on the substantive provisions of Labor Law article 6”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Levine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Odeon Capital Group LLC v. AckermanSecond Circuit· 2017-07-21· cited 38×
- Tischmann v. ITT/Sheraton Corp.S.D. New York· 1995-04-10· cited 31×
- Contrera v. LangerS.D. Illinois· 2018-06-04· cited 31×
- Taylor v. Blaylock & Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-06-19· cited 29×
- Graham Court Owner's Corp. v. Kyle TaylorNew York Court of Appeals· 2015-02-19· cited 26×
- Canet v. Gooch Ware TravelsteadE.D. New York· 1996-02-21· cited 22×
- Ambac Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-05-16· cited 21×
- Kaplan v. Aspen Knolls Corp.E.D. New York· 2003-11-06· cited 20×
- Kletter v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-08-03· cited 20×
- Solow v. WellnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-06-09· cited 20×
- Ackerman v. New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of QueensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-04-08· cited 15×
- Angello v. Labor Ready, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 2006-11-16· cited 13×
- Guiry v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-05-18· cited 13×
- Gebhardt v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/NewhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-06-08· cited 11×
- De La Cruz v. Caddell Dry Dock & Repair Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-10-25· cited 10×
- Sorrentino v. Bohbot Entertainment & Media, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-10-26· cited 10×
- Gallegos v. Brandeis SchoolE.D. New York· 1999-10-18· cited 10×
- APF Management Co. v. MunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-06-07· cited 9×
- Pachter v. Bernard Hodes Group, Inc.Second Circuit· 2007-10-12· cited 8×
- Financial Technologies International, Inc. v. SmithS.D. New York· 2002-11-06· cited 7×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co.
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-06-25· cited 1×
- Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co.New York Supreme Court· 1991-07-19· cited 1×
- Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1993-01-14
- Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-11-14
- Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-10-20
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.