Skip to main content
S.D. Illinois· 3/5/2018

Contrera v. Langer

Citations

  • 290 F. Supp. 3d 269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a court may take “judicial notice on a motion to dismiss of filings in state or federal court.”
  • holding that requirement was met by plaintiff's filing affidavit to motion to conditionally approve case as FLSA collective action in which plaintiff stated he was a plaintiff in the action
  • noting, after collecting cases, that “none of the cited cases require that a written consent to join an FLSA collective action take any specific form, other than being written and filed with the court”
  • collecting cases for the proposition that “courts have routinely found that § 256’s requirement is satisfied where a named plaintiff files a sworn declaration with the court stating that he or she is the named plaintiff in a collective action”
  • declaration with same averments as in Mendez satisfies § 256 consent requirement.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorenstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.