Continental Cas. Co. v. Ryan Inc. Eastern

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a pedestrian was an omnibus insured under a driver’s insurance policy covering bodily injuries sustained by “a pedestrian, through being struck by the insured motor vehicle”
• explaining that “subrogation is a broader concept [than an assignment]” and an assignment of rights is a conventional subrogation agreement
• stating that criminal defendants do not have the constitutional right to simultaneously be represented by counsel and represent themselves
• reaffirming the principle from W. Fla. Grocery Co. that the law is well-settled that anti- assignment provisions do not apply after loss
• discussing the difference between an assignment and an equitable subrogation
• discussing the difference between an assignment and an equitable subrogation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).