Skip to main content
· 3/16/1989

Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Barnett Bank of Marion County, NA

Citations

  • 540 So. 2d 113
  • 7 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1356
  • 14 Fla. L. Weekly 107
  • 1989 Fla. LEXIS 170
  • 1989 WL 23390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the purpose of a surety is to protect the owner of the bond
  • recognizing that the purpose of a surety is to protect the owner of the bond
  • holding that a surety’s subrogation right is not a security interest yet supersedes a security interest of a contract as-signee, such as a bank with an interest in a debtor’s accounts receivable
  • stating that “it is appropriate to give priority to the claims of the surety, up to the limits of its performance”
  • adopting ‘“federal view’ that sureties ha[ve] priority [over other creditors] by virtue of equitable subrogation”
  • “rights of the surety as subrogee are not inferior even to the rights of the obligee and may be asserted against the obligee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.