One Call Property Services, Inc. a/a/o William Hughes v. Security First Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court properly determined that an insurance policy was impliedly incorporated where \[t]he complaint refers to the policy\ and the suit was premised on an assignment of the policy
• holding that trial court properly determined that an insurance policy was impliedly incorporated where “[t]he complaint refers to the policy, and One Call’s standing to bring suit is premised on an assignment of the policy”
• holding that “where the terms of a legal document are impliedly incorporated by reference into the complaint, the trial court may consider the contents of the document in ruling on a motion to dismiss”
• discussing a general assignment provision, rather than the limited provision at issue in Security First and the instant case
• noting: “Even when an insurance policy contains a provision barring assignment of the policy, an insured may assign a post-loss claim”
• declining to apply the tipsy coachman doctrine, reversing, and remanding for the trial court to address the alternative arguments in the first instance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).