Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 5/31/1996

Consolidated Stores, Inc. v. Gargis

Citations

  • 686 So. 2d 268
  • 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 435
  • 1996 WL 292094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employee who, for the purpose of obtaining Social Security disability benefits, asserted that he was disabled could not assert that he was not disabled, for the purpose of prosecuting his retaliatory-discharge claim
  • holding the doctrine applicable where prior inconsistent position was asserted in a Social Security disability hearing
  • judicial estoppel serves to protect the integrity of the judicial proceedings
  • judicial estoppel serves to protect the integrity of the judicial proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crawley, Monroe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Consolidated Stores, Inc. v. Gargis

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.