Consolidated Stores, Inc. v. Gargis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee who, for the purpose of obtaining Social Security disability benefits, asserted that he was disabled could not assert that he was not disabled, for the purpose of prosecuting his retaliatory-discharge claim
• holding the doctrine applicable where prior inconsistent position was asserted in a Social Security disability hearing
• judicial estoppel serves to protect the integrity of the judicial proceedings
• judicial estoppel serves to protect the integrity of the judicial proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Consolidated Stores, Inc. v. Gargis

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Consolidated Stores, Inc. v. Gargis
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1996-11-22