Skip to main content
· 1/28/2000

Jinright v. Paulk

Citations

  • 758 So. 2d 553
  • 2000 WL 92252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that among the questions of fact essential to a determination of the applicability of the doctrine of judicial es-toppel is “whether a debtor who is engaged in bankruptcy proceedings knew or should have known about claims or causes of action that should be disclosed as assets”
  • noting that among the questions of fact essential to a determination of the applicability of the doctrine of judicial estoppel is \whether a debtor who is engaged in bankruptcy proceedings knew or should have known about claims or causes of action that should be disclosed as assets\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lyons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.