· 4/24/1992
Selma Foundry v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.
Citations
- 598 So. 2d 844
- 1992 Ala. LEXIS 429
- 1992 WL 81106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing, but distinguishing, Oneida based upon Chapter 11 debtor's amendment of disclosure statements identifying claim as asset
- refusing to apply doctrine of res judicata to claims that defendant alleged should have been brought in turnover proceeding in bankruptcy court
- debtor not judicially estopped from asserting a suit which was not included in its original disclosure statement since debtor listed the suit in an amended disclosure statement
- debtor not judicially estopped from asserting a suit which was not included in its original disclosure statement since debtor listed the suit in an amended disclosure statement
- debtor not judicially estopped from asserting a suit which was not included in its original disclosure statement since debtor listed the suit in an amended disclosure statement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Almon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.