District of Columbia· 4/4/2014
Conservation Law Foundation v. Pritzker
Citations
- 37 F. Supp. 3d 254
- 2014 WL 1338596
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46543
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When an agency commits a legal error, a court ‘normally remand[s] . . . to the agency.’ (quoting Fogg v. Ashcroft, 254 F.3d 103, 111 (D.C. Cir. 2001))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- National Parks Conservation Association v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-31· cited 26×
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2014-10-14· cited 17×
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. RossD.C. Circuit· 2018-05-10· cited 12×
- Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. U.S. Department of AgricultureDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-09· cited 9×
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict of Columbia· 2017-10-11
- Center for Biological Diversity v. RossDistrict of Columbia· 2018-05-10
- Center for Biological Diversity v. RossDistrict of Columbia· 2019-10-31
- Williams v. RossDistrict of Columbia· 2021-02-18
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. RaimondoDistrict of Columbia· 2024-09-05
- American Federation of Government Employees v. U.S. Department of EducationDistrict of Columbia· 2025-11-07
- Southeastern Fisheries Association, Inc. v. LutnickDistrict of Columbia· 2026-05-21
- Pa Education Association v. United States Department of EducationDistrict of Columbia· 2026-06-24
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 8,453×
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 3,086×
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1975-02-24· cited 2,871×
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court· 1953-05-25· cited 2,512×
- Burrage v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2014-01-27· cited 689×
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. BredesenSixth Circuit· 2007-08-28· cited 608×
- Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 448×
- Sierra Club v. MainellaDistrict of Columbia· 2012-04-25· cited 384×
- Compton James Richards v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceD.C. Circuit· 1977-03-18· cited 344×
- Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 2014-01-27· cited 263×
- Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. United States Department of EnergyD.C. Circuit· 1980-02-28· cited 129×
- Bloch v. PowellDistrict of Columbia· 2002-08-08· cited 116×
- Americans for Safe Access v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2013-01-22· cited 113×
- Advocates for Highway & Auto Safety v. Federal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2005-12-02· cited 111×
- Atlantic City Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2002-07-12· cited 108×
- Hunt v. Imperial Merchant Services, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2009-03-31· cited 87×
- Kazarian v. US Citizenship & Immigration ServicesNinth Circuit· 2010-03-04· cited 79×
Other cases named Conservation Law Foundation v. Pritzker
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.