Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 7/13/2010

Connecticut v. Duncan

Citations

  • 612 F.3d 107
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14256
  • 2010 WL 2736939

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A district court’s ripeness determination is . . . a legal 16 determination subject to de novo review.”
  • “While the District Court is capable of resolving this factual and legal dispute, administrative proceedings are a more suitable venue because they will allow for fact-intensive inquiries related to . . . the agency’s area of expertise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, Straub, Livingston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Connecticut v. Duncan

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.