Skip to main content
· 7/18/2012

Belmont Abbey College v. Sebelius

Citations

  • 878 F. Supp. 2d 25
  • 2012 WL 2914417
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that advance notice of proposed rulemaking is “not ‘sufficiently final’ to satisfy the fitness prong of the ripeness inquiry”
  • concluding that “the Departments’ position on the policy at issue remains indeterminate”
  • finding that supervisor’s “loud and aggressive” statements and actions of “slamm[ing] his hands on the desk” during meeting failed to constitute hostile work environment
  • finding that religiously-affiliated college lacked standing
  • “[I]f we do not decide the issue now, we may never need to.” (alterations omitted
  • “Costs stemming from Plaintiffs desire to prepare for contingencies are not sufficient, however, to constitute hardship ... particularly when the agency’s promises and actions suggest the situation Plaintiff fears may not occur.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.