S.D. New York· 4/27/2004
Condit v. Dunne
Citations
- 317 F. Supp. 2d 344
- 33 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1289
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7247
- 2004 WL 895650
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that New York’s interest in regulating the conduct of its media “remains even when the target of the statement lives in another state”
- taking judicial notice of news articles as evidence of an alleged “media frenzy” that was described in the complaint
- finding defendant not immune from slander for “literally true” statements where defendant was retelling false and defamatory stories
- finding that “the policy interests of New York and California in having their respective laws applied essentially offset” because “New York has an interest here in applying its laws to the speaker, and California has an interest here in applying its laws to the target”
- taking judicial notice of “widespread publicity” and “media frenzy” and citing cases
- “To determine whether a statement declares or implies a false assertion of fact,” look to “both to the statement itself and to the context in which it was published.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leisure
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chamberlain v. City of White PlainsS.D. New York· 2013-12-10· cited 124×
- Greenberg v. SpitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-09-13· cited 70×
- Reuland v. HynesSecond Circuit· 2006-08-21· cited 69×
- Condit v. DunneS.D. New York· 2004-12-08· cited 61×
- Kinsey v. New York Times Co.Second Circuit· 2021-03-15· cited 60×
- Schubert v. City of RyeS.D. New York· 2011-03-31· cited 58×
- Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Bleeping Computer LLCS.D. New York· 2016-07-08· cited 53×
- Dickerson v. Novartis Corp.S.D. New York· 2016-04-21· cited 49×
- Biro v. Condé NastS.D. New York· 2013-08-01· cited 46×
- Adelson v. HarrisS.D. New York· 2013-09-30· cited 46×
- In Re Alstom SA Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2005-12-22· cited 36×
- Condit v. DunneS.D. New York· 2004-12-15· cited 14×
- Marchant Investment & Management Co. v. St. Anthony West Neighborhood Organization, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-04-05· cited 13×
- Catalanello v. KramerS.D. New York· 2014-05-07· cited 11×
- Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.D. Kansas· 2012-08-20· cited 8×
- BFI Group Divino Corp. v. JSC Russian AluminumS.D. New York· 2007-03-23· cited 6×
- PowerDsine, Inc. v. AMI Semiconductor, Inc.S.D. New York· 2008-12-18· cited 4×
- Prudential Retirement Insurance v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.S.D. New York· 2011-03-28· cited 3×
- Hatfill v. FosterS.D. New York· 2005-11-02· cited 2×
- Cook v. MillerCoors, LLCM.D. Florida· 2011-10-28· cited 2×
Cites
66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 8,668×
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court· 1967-10-09· cited 1,899×
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court· 1976-05-24· cited 1,830×
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,770×
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 1,111×
- Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 1,025×
- Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 951×
- Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court· 1986-04-21· cited 858×
- Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. BreslerSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 794×
- Rothman v. GregorSecond Circuit· 2000-07-11· cited 778×
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals· 1963-05-09· cited 756×
- Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 723×
- Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-11-10· cited 602×
- Melanie Geisler v. Orlando R. Petrocelli and Pinnacle Books, Inc.Second Circuit· 1980-03-03· cited 404×
- Lino Celle and Radio Mindanao Network Usa, Inc. v. Filipino Reporter Enterprises Inc. And Libertito PelayoSecond Circuit· 2000-04-12· cited 323×
- Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp.Second Circuit· 1976-12-01· cited 322×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.