S.D. New York· 7/8/2016
Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Bleeping Computer LLC
Citations
- 194 F. Supp. 3d 263
- 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89160
- 2016 WL 3773394
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, “by alleging that [the defendant] earns a commission on directed sales of [a third party’s] products, the [plaintiff] adequately pleads that [the defendant] has an economic incentive to engage in such promotion”
- concluding that, “by alleging that [the defendant] earns a commission on directed sales of [a third party’s] products, the [plaintiff] adequately pleads that [the defendant] has an economic incentive to engage in such promotion”
- finding grossly irresponsible standard met where pleadings alleged that defendant “knowingly or recklessly relied on discredited and outdated sources”
- declining to dismiss claims where internet posts went “beyond merely hyperlinking” to the original post and instead “contain[ed] additional statements which [plaintiff] alleges are themselves defamatory”
- explaining that where “the predicate facts are disclosed but are false, such that the disparity between the stated facts and the truth would cause a reader to question the opinion’s validity, the opinion may be an actionable defamatory opinion” (quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted)
- “New York law absolutely protects statements of pure opinion, such that they can never be defamatory.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Engelmayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Malwarebytes Inc.S.D. New York· 2017-05-12· cited 35×
- Mirage Entm't, Inc. v. FEG Entretenimientos S.A.S.D. Illinois· 2018-08-29· cited 22×
- Hosseinzadeh v. KleinS.D. New York· 2017-08-23· cited 12×
- Frascatore v. BlakeS.D. Illinois· 2018-09-25· cited 6×
- Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am. v. CuomoN.D. New York· 2018-11-06· cited 5×
- Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. v. Pdd Holdings Inc.District of Columbia· 2026-01-07
Cites
106 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court· 2014-03-25· cited 2,704×
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Second Circuit· 2010-04-29· cited 2,656×
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court· 1967-10-09· cited 1,899×
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,770×
- Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd. v. Consumeraffairs. Com, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2009-12-29· cited 1,712×
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 941×
- Time, Inc. v. FirestoneSupreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 626×
- Wolston v. Reader's Digest Assn., Inc.Supreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 442×
- Lino Celle and Radio Mindanao Network Usa, Inc. v. Filipino Reporter Enterprises Inc. And Libertito PelayoSecond Circuit· 2000-04-12· cited 323×
- Steinhilber v. AlphonseNew York Court of Appeals· 1986-10-23· cited 296×
- Chapadeau v. Utica Observer-Dispatch, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1975-12-04· cited 293×
- Batzel v. SmithNinth Circuit· 2003-06-24· cited 290×
- Gross v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1993-10-21· cited 285×
- Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. ComNinth Circuit· 2008-04-03· cited 279×
- Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1981-05-12· cited 270×
- Immuno AG. v. Moor-JankowskiNew York Court of Appeals· 1991-01-15· cited 247×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.