Com'r of Env. Prot. v. State Five Indus.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing court was left with “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made” due to, inter alia, trial court’s employment of improper reasoning when analyzing facts
• it is ‘‘the prerogative of the legislature, rather than the courts, to amend the statutory scheme’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).