Acree v. McMahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Georgia law does not allow reverse-veil-piercing
• rejecting reverse piercing claim because standard judgment collection procedures were sufficient to cover shareholder liability
• declining to allow “outsider reverse piercing” claim because, among other things, traditional theories provided adequate remedies
• a third-party creditor may not disregard corporate form so as to reach corporate assets to satisfy claims against an individual corporate insider
• a third-party creditor may not disregard corporate form so as to reach corporate assets to satisfy claims against an individual corporate insider
• a third party creditor may not disregard corporate form so as to reach corporate assets to satisfy claims against an individual corporate insider

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).