Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 6/20/2002
Compaq Computer Corp. v. Lapray
Citations
- 79 S.W.3d 779
- 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 4378
- 2002 WL 1339905
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Tires and cars have a distinctly limited usable life. At the end of the product’s life, the product and whatever defect it may have had pass away. If a defect does not manifest itself in that time span, the buyer has gotten what he bargained for”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker, Burgess, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. DaccachTexas Supreme Court· 2007-03-02· cited 243×
- Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2005-11-03· cited 147×
- Compaq Computer Corp. v. LaprayTexas Supreme Court· 2004-05-07· cited 139×
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationS.D. New York· 2017-06-30· cited 72×
- Polaris Industries, Inc. v. McDonaldTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2003-08-13· cited 34×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BowdenTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-07-10· cited 23×
- General Motors Corp. v. GarzaTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-08-03· cited 18×
- Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. Hakim DaccachTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-04-24· cited 9×
- BMG DIRECT MARKETING, INC., Appellant, v. Patrick PEAKE, Et Al, AppelleeTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2003-05-01· cited 3×
- eMachines, Inc. v. PackardTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2004-10-28
- Unnamed caseTexas Supreme Court· 2007-03-02
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-11-03
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-11-03
- Citizens Insurance Company of America Citizens, Inc. Harold E. Riley and Mark A. Oliver v. Dr. Fernando Hakim DaccachTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-04-24
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2004-10-28
- Polaris Industries, Inc., and Randy Ballard D/B/A American Outdoor Power v. Larry McDonaldTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2003-08-13
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-05-01
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 4,535×
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court· 1997-11-13· cited 3,583×
- Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1996-05-10· cited 879×
- Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court· 1985-07-17· cited 346×
- K-Mart Corp. v. HoneycuttTexas Supreme Court· 2000-06-29· cited 342×
- Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. BernalTexas Supreme Court· 2000-05-11· cited 339×
- Briehl v. General Motors CorporationEighth Circuit· 1999-04-14· cited 159×
- Berger v. Compaq Computer Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2001-07-25· cited 158×
- Claude Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Asbestos Corporation LimitedFifth Circuit· 1998-09-21· cited 145×
- Ford Motor Co. v. SheldonTexas Supreme Court· 2000-05-11· cited 142×
- Weatherly v. Deloitte & ToucheTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1995-09-28· cited 133×
- Cunningham Brothers, Inc. v. Harry BailSeventh Circuit· 1969-06-16· cited 130×
- California Products, Inc. v. Puretex Lemon Juice, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1960-03-23· cited 130×
- Feinstein v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.S.D. New York· 1982-03-30· cited 122×
- Intratex Gas Co. v. BeesonTexas Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 118×
- Microsoft Corp. v. ManningTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1995-12-05· cited 118×
- Wilks v. Ford Motor Co.D. New Jersey· 1997-08-28· cited 99×
- Monsanto Co. v. DavisTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-07-26· cited 96×
- Dresser Industries, Inc. v. SnellTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1993-03-03· cited 91×
- Sullivan v. Chase Investment Services of Boston, Inc.N.D. California· 1978-06-06· cited 78×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.