Skip to main content
· 5/7/2004

Compaq Computer Corp. v. Lapray

Citations

  • 135 S.W.3d 657
  • 53 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 483
  • 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 522
  • 2004 Tex. LEXIS 435
  • 2004 WL 1048336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in reversing certification order for failure to conduct rigorous choice of law analysis, challenges to other certification prerequisites need not be addressed
  • holding that in reversing certification order for failure to conduct rigorous choice of law analysis, challenges to other certification prerequisites need not be addressed
  • recognizing that the law in Texas is unclear regarding whether to permit claims for unmanifested defects
  • noting that federal decisions and authorities interpreting current federal class action requirements are persuasive authority in Texas courts
  • noting that federal decisions and authorities interpreting current federal class action requirements are persuasive authority in Texas courts
  • holding “the lower courts erred by failing to conduct a state-by-state analysis of the questions of law presented”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jefferson, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.