· 5/7/2004
Compaq Computer Corp. v. Lapray
Citations
- 135 S.W.3d 657
- 53 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 483
- 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 522
- 2004 Tex. LEXIS 435
- 2004 WL 1048336
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in reversing certification order for failure to conduct rigorous choice of law analysis, challenges to other certification prerequisites need not be addressed
- holding that in reversing certification order for failure to conduct rigorous choice of law analysis, challenges to other certification prerequisites need not be addressed
- recognizing that the law in Texas is unclear regarding whether to permit claims for unmanifested defects
- noting that federal decisions and authorities interpreting current federal class action requirements are persuasive authority in Texas courts
- noting that federal decisions and authorities interpreting current federal class action requirements are persuasive authority in Texas courts
- holding “the lower courts erred by failing to conduct a state-by-state analysis of the questions of law presented”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jefferson, Phillips
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.