Skip to main content
· 12/5/1995

Microsoft Corp. v. Manning

Citations

  • 914 S.W.2d 602
  • 1995 WL 669604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding software that could not successfully perform data compression C regardless of whether plaintiff attempted to use this feature C did not or would not perform adequately in its ordinary function so that a A defect @ existed causing injury and loss of benefit-of-the-bargain damages
  • A This issue often is collapsed into typicality analysis. @
  • contributory negligence, superseding cause, and failure to comply with warranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelius, Bleil, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.