Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/20/2018
Commonwealth v. Smith
Citations
- 194 A.3d 126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant did not satisfy due diligence requirement by offering no reasonable explanation for a 13-year delay in obtaining affidavit
- holding that defendant did not satisfy due diligence requirement by offering no reasonable explanation for a 13-year delay in obtaining new evidence
- concluding that petitioner’s lack of due diligence was apparent on the face of the record, where petitioner knew of potential witness years before securing an affidavit from him
- holding that petitioner did not exercise due diligence to obtain witness’s affidavit when pre-trial discovery indicated that witness had made a statement to police but petitioner did not request the statement or pursue affidavit for over 13 years
- holding that petitioner did not exercise due diligence -9- J-A08045-23 to obtain witness’s affidavit when pre-trial discovery indicated that witness had made a statement to police but petitioner did not request the statement or pursue affidavit for over 13 years
- providing that, under both governmental interference exception and newly discovered facts exception, petitioner must show that he acted with due diligence in obtaining witness affidavit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender, Stabile, Platt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Com. v. Williams, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-01-25· cited 43×
- Com. v. Alceus, F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-05-08· cited 16×
- Scioli Turco, Inc. v. Prileau, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-03-29· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. Towles, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-08-22
- Com. v. Baker, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-02-10
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
- Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-23· cited 1,230×
- Commonwealth v. CartretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-24· cited 1,101×
- Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-08· cited 887×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Burton, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-03-28· cited 444×
- Commonwealth v. HackettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-26· cited 329×
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-08-25· cited 181×
- Commonwealth v. KeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-30· cited 158×
- Commonwealth v. LawrenceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-27· cited 136×
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-08-19· cited 114×
- Commonwealth v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-26· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. MundaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-10-10· cited 91×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-06· cited 65×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Johnson v. BookbinderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-11-14· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.