Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 9/29/1995
Commonwealth v. Wharton
Citations
- 665 A.2d 458
- 542 Pa. 83
- 1995 Pa. LEXIS 969
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, to rebut a defendant’s assertion of the Section 9711(e)(1) mitigator, the Commonwealth is permitted to present all of the defendant’s prior convictions, including those which were contemporaneous with the defendant’s first degree murder conviction
- if the defendant presents evidence of a mitigating factor under Section 9711(e)(1), the Commonwealth is permitted to present as rebuttal all of the defendant’s prior convictions
- if defendant pursues his lack of a significant criminal history as a mitigating circumstance, the Commonwealth is permitted to present as rebuttal all of the defendant’s prior convictions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zarpala, Cappy, Castille, Montemuro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. WhartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-11-28· cited 309×
- Commonwealth v. Wholaver, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-01-11· cited 267×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-22· cited 204×
- Commonwealth v. Mitchell, W., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-16· cited 190×
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-19· cited 186×
- Commonwealth v. WhartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-11-25· cited 144×
- Commonwealth v. BridgesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-24· cited 133×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-21· cited 111×
- Commonwealth v. PhilistinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-07-18· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-09-28· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. Smith, W., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-12-21· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. HanibleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-19· cited 45×
- In Re Suspension of the Capital Unitary Review ActSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-19· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. LeseoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-05-21· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. WhartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-19
- Commonwealth v. Wharton, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-11-17
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,392×
- Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-30· cited 709×
- Commonwealth v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-20· cited 227×
- Commonwealth v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-10· cited 196×
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-05· cited 105×
- Commonwealth v. WhartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-04-28· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. LeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-21· cited 91×
- Commonwealth v. StrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-26· cited 66×
- Ledet v. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitSupreme Court· 1991-11-12· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. HaagSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-10· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-03-29· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.