Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/4/1991
Commonwealth v. Glass
Citations
- 586 A.2d 369
- 526 Pa. 329
- 1991 Pa. LEXIS 26
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that fifty-one month delay between conviction and sentencing did not violate defendant's right to speedy trial or due process in light of Barker.
- holding that fifty-one month delay between conviction and sentencing did not violate defendant’s right to speedy trial or due process in light of Barker.
- applying Barker in discussing delays in sentencing after conviction and holding that the same considerations applicable to speedy trial claims are applicable to claimed due process violations based on sentencing delay
- applying Barker in discussing delays in sentencing after conviction and holding that the same considerations applicable to speedy trial claims are applicable to claimed due process violations based on sentencing delay
- “[t]he asserted right to promptness in appeals is framed in terms of due process rather than the speedy trial right ... ”
- \[t]he asserted right to promptness in appeals is framed in terms of due process rather than the speedy trial right...\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Larsen, McDermott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Betterman v. MontanaSupreme Court· 2016-05-19· cited 171×
- Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-27· cited 119×
- Commonwealth v. AndersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-02-18· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. ZimmickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-23· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. DeBlaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-29· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-04-26· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. AdamoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-02-10· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. DozierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-20· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. BlairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-07-30· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. DehoniestoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-04-29· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. McCordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-05-10· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. AndersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-08-22· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-07· cited 10×
- People v. GreenColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-04-26· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. RosariusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-19· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-10-31· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. DeBlaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-01-07· cited 2×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 3,068×
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court· 1966-02-23· cited 1,196×
- Commonwealth v. GravelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-06· cited 202×
- Wayne Paul Burkett v. Richard Cunningham, WardenThird Circuit· 1987-07-31· cited 193×
- Commonwealth v. PoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-03· cited 144×
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-24· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. GreerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-02-24· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-03-16· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. GloverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-27· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-06-23· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.