Commonwealth v. Welch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] conviction for simple assault merges with a conviction for robbery for purposes of sentencing. After the crime of robbery is established no additional facts [are] necessary to prove simple assault.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Miranda
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-12· cited 65×
• Commonwealth v. Jenkins
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-07-15· cited 57×
• Commonwealth v. Mathis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-22· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Campbell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-31· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Wallace
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-11-25· cited 39×
• Commonwealth v. Bogden
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-06-05· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Mathis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-29· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-23· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-08· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Padden
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-10-30· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Martinez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-18· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Staples
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-01-13· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Reardon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-18· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Jerry
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-23· cited 9×