Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Campbell

Citations

  • 505 A.2d 262
  • 351 Pa. Super. 56
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether statutes defining offenses contain different elements is to be considered in determining whether the offenses merge
  • whether statutes defining offenses contain different elements is to be considered in determining whether the offenses merge
  • double jeopardy claim is addressed to the legality of the sentence imposed
  • discussing merger of related offenses
  • Concurring Opinion by Wieand, J.
  • Concurring Opinion by Wieand, J.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Cavanaugh, Brosky, Rowley, Wieand, McEwen, Sole, Beck, Tamilia, Cava-Naugh, Former

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.