Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Martin

Citations

  • 462 A.2d 859
  • 316 Pa. Super. 190
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that this Court may disregard an appellant’s failure to satisfy Rule 904(d)
  • addressing the merits of an appeal where the notice of appeal indicated that the appeal was from a vacated order but the appellant's brief indicated that the appeal was from a later, valid order
  • criminal conspiracy merges with attempted rape since both are inchoate crimes under Chapter 9 of the Crimes Code
  • notice of appeal stated erroneously that appeal was from sentencing order that was vacated one month later in resentencing order
  • “It is implicit in Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 904, which governs the content of the notice of appeal, that the correct date of the order appealed should be included in the notice of appeal.”
  • although appellant’s notice of appeal was taken from vacated order, court addressed merits of case despite procedural misstep where it was obvious from appellant’s brief that he was appealing later, valid order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hester, Johnson, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.