Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Watley

Citations

  • 153 A.3d 1034
  • 2016 Pa. Super. 311
  • 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an order granting in part and denying in part all issues raised in a PCRA petition is a final order for purposes of appeal
  • holding: an order granting in part and denying in part all issues raised in a PCRA petition is a final order for purposes of appeal
  • holding an order granting in part and denying in part all issues raised in a PCRA petition is a final order for purposes of appeal
  • finding that because the claim that the evidence should have been suppressed was without merit, counsel was not ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress
  • explaining that it was not relevant to reasonable suspicion inquiry that “neither of the troopers testified that they feared for their safety”; rather, relevant inquiry is objective reasonableness of search
  • stating counsel will not be found ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress if the grounds asserted for that motion lack merit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Moulton, Musmanno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.