Skip to main content
· 5/15/2002

Commonwealth v. Carmody

Citations

  • 799 A.2d 143
  • 2002 Pa. Super. 151
  • 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in applying excited utterance exception, “[t]he crucial question, regardless of the time lapse, is whether, at the time the statement is made, the nervous excitement continues to dominate while the reflective processes remain in abeyance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Klein, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.