Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Brown

Citations

  • 727 A.2d 541
  • 556 Pa. 131
  • 1999 Pa. LEXIS 844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “consent is not a defense to the charges of [r]ape and/or IDSI with an unconscious person.”
  • holding amendment violating Rule 564 is fatal only when variance between original and new charges prejudices appellant
  • holding amendment violating Rule 564 only fatal when variance between original and new charges prejudices appellant
  • concluding prejudice results if new charges render defenses to original charges ineffective

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.