Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Wade

Citations

  • 33 A.3d 108
  • 2011 WL 5617856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding Section 9765 prohibits merger of sentences unless strict two-part test met
  • holding Section 9765 prohibits merger of sentences unless strict two-part test met
  • holding Section 9765 prohibits merger of sentences unless strict two-part test met
  • discussing the relationship between double jeopardy analysis and the merger statute, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9765
  • explaining that merged offenses do not violate double jeopardy
  • “The Complainant … was able to view [Appellant] at the time of the crime when he removed his mask in the car prior to driving away.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Gantman, Lazarus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.