Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Vega

Citations

  • 850 A.2d 1277
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 196
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing claim that sentence is manifestly excessive and disproportionate to crime, particularly in light of facts surrounding criminal episode and appellant’s background, raises substantial question
  • finding claim that sentence is excessive and disproportionate to the crime, particularly in light of facts surrounding appellants’ background, raises a substantial question for review
  • determining the appellant raised a substantial question with the claim that the sentence was grossly disproportionate to “the facts surrounding the criminal episode and his background”
  • determining the appellant raised a substantial question with the claim that the sentence was grossly disproportionate to “the facts surrounding the criminal episode and his background”
  • finding claim that sentence is -5- J-S62006-19 excessive and disproportionate to the crime, particularly in light of facts surrounding appellants’ background, raises a substantial question for review
  • An “open” plea agreement is one in which there is no negotiated sentence and gives the trial court discretion to impose an individualized sentence.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Bender, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.