Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/27/2005
Commonwealth v. Lee
Citations
- 876 A.2d 408
- 2005 Pa. Super. 160
- 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a challenge to the maximum sentence imposed, where the appellant argues he “will not be paroled by the PBPP at expiration of his minimum sentence,” implicates the discretionary aspects of his sentence
- stating that claim that the trial court erred in imposing an excessive sentence is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of a sentence
- stating that “[i]t is well-settled that a claim that the sentence imposed by the trial court was manifestly excessive is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of the sentence” (citation omitted)
- reiterating that a bald allegation of excessiveness does not present a substantial question
- stating claim that sentence is manifestly excessive constitutes challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence
- stating claim that sentence is manifestly excessive challenges discretionary aspects of sentencing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender, Panella, Popovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. YeomansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-07-01· cited 296×
- Commonwealth v. MearsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-05-04· cited 65×
- Com. v. Jones, V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-10-24
- Commonwealth v. WolfLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-04-14
- Commonwealth v. LawheadLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-04-21
- Commonwealth v. HolmesLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-07-16
- Commonwealth v. HartLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-10-27
- Commonwealth v. KrauseLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-10-27
- Commonwealth v. KiblerLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2011-03-01
- Commonwealth v. ClotterLackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-02-10
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-19· cited 702×
- Commonwealth v. DrumhellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-20· cited 254×
- Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-02· cited 222×
- Commonwealth v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-03· cited 218×
- Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-22· cited 140×
- In the Interest of M.W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-02-25· cited 115×
- Commonwealth v. EbySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-10-04· cited 109×
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 108×
- Commonwealth v. TitusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-23· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-31· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. KorenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-25· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. WallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-03-23· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. BishopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-08-21· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-18· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-05-27· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. CelestinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-02· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. MessmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-01· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. KittrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-04-03· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. ParrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-22· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. VegaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-05-27· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.