Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Thomas

Citations

  • 744 A.2d 713
  • 560 Pa. 249
  • 2000 Pa. LEXIS 111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding claims of ineffective assistance of counsel must allege with specificity sufficient facts in support of the 17 claim
  • declining to find counsel ineffective “where appellant fail[ed] to allege with specificity sufficient facts in support of his claim.”
  • declining to find counsel ineffective “where appellant fail[ed] to allege with specificity sufficient facts in support of his claim.”
  • declining to find counsel ineffective “where appellant fail[ed] to allege with specificity sufficient facts in support of his claim.”
  • declining to find counsel ineffective “where appellant fail[ed] to allege with specificity sufficient facts in support of his claim.”
  • declining to find counsel ineffective “where appellant fail[ed] to allege with specificity - 14 - J-S93034-16 sufficient facts in support of his claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.