Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/31/2001

Commonwealth v. Lambert

Citations

797 A.2d 232
568 Pa. 346
2001 Pa. LEXIS 2823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a claim that could have been raised on direct appeal, but was not, is waived under the PCRA
concluding that ten of PCRA appellant’s issues were waived because they could have been raised on direct appeal
holding that claims which could have been raised on direct appeal but were not are waived under the PCRA
stating that “claims … not raised in appellant’s PCRA petition … are waived.”
noting previous per curiam order remanding for PCRA court opinion pursuant to (Roy) Williams
finding claims waived where they could have been raised on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Gro, Newman, Saylor, Gappy, Nigro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.