Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 7/18/2000

Commonwealth v. Tharp

Citations

754 A.2d 1251
562 Pa. 231
2000 Pa. LEXIS 1707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that amendment to Article I, Section 6 was constitutional and that there was no impediment, constitutional or otherwise, to applying it in this case
holding amendment to Article I, § 6, which affords Commonwealth same right to jury trial as accused, is constitutional
holding amendment to Article I, § 6, which affords Commonwealth same right to jury trial as accused, is constitutional
noting that the Court need not address issues in brief of amicus curiae because appellant had not raised the issue below or before the Court
rejecting the constitutional challenge to the 1998 amendment to Article I, Section 6, and holding that there was no impediment to applying the amendment to the facts presented
Article I, § 6, which affords Commonwealth same right to jury trial as accused, is constitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.