Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n v. Department of Public Welfare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that DPW was not an aggrieved party, as the prevailing party, and it did not need to file a cross-appeal
• holding that DPW was not an aggrieved party, as the prevailing party, and it did not need to file a cross-appeal
• finding that “where a person is not adversely affected in any way by the matter challenged, he is not aggrieved and thus has no standing to obtain a judicial resolution of that challenge.”
• explaining that under William Penn 'where a person is not adversely affected in any way by the matter challenged, he is not aggrieved and thus has no standing to obtain a judicial resolution of that challenge.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).