Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/25/2001
Commonwealth v. Young
Citations
- 767 A.2d 1072
- 2001 Pa. Super. 27
- 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 26
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Karaffa when trial court provided jury with written copy of defendant’s confession, and rejecting harmless error analysis because court’s actions were “inherently prejudicial” and counsel was ineffective for failing to object
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brosky, Eakin, McEwen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-09-18· cited 185×
- Commonwealth v. AndersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-02-18· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. KaraffaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-04-03· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. TerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-11· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. FosterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-04-20· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. PenroseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-12-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.