Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/27/2019

Commonwealth v. Tanner

Citations

205 A.3d 388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a township and “an insurance company is entitled to receive restitution only when it compensates a victim” under the pre-2018 amendments to Section 1106
stating that Section 11.103 “defines a ‘victim’ as an individual who has been harmed by the offender” and noting that “a government agency is not entitled to restitution because it is [not] an individual victim . . . .”
vacating guilty plea and remanding for a new trial where restitution was ordered to an improper victim as a result of a negotiated plea agreement
explaining that publicity must be “inflammatory and slanted toward conviction.”
“an award of restitution relates to the legality of a sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panella, Lazarus, Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.