Commonwealth v. Swartz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jury could disbelieve defendant’s alibi; evidence of consciousness of guilt, together with other evidence, may suffice to prove guilt
• “inference of defendant’s guilt from all circumstances, ‘while not compelling, was at least permissible’ ”
• while not conclusive, consciousness of guilt may combine with other 6 evidence to support guilty finding
• inference of defendant’s guilt from all circumstances, “while not compelling, was at least permissible”
• jury's disbelief of defendant's testimony \could not provide affirmative evidence\
• jury’s disbelief of defendant’s testimony “could not provide affirmative evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).