Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Stone

Citations

  • 291 S.W.3d 696
  • 2009 Ky. LEXIS 192
  • 2009 WL 2705855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that where a redacted statement did not create a false impression, the defendant had no right to require the balance of his statement be admitted; if dissatisfied, he “was free to testify at trial and fully present the facts as he understood them to be”
  • explaining that where a redacted statement did not create a false impression, the defendant had no right to require the balance of his statement be admitted; if dissatisfied, he “was free to testify at trial and fully present the facts as he understood them to be”
  • “‘Opening the door’ to otherwise inadmissible evidence is a form of waiver that happens when one party’s use of inadmissible evidence justifies the opposing party's rebuttal of that evidence with equally inadmissible proof”
  • rejecting assault defendant's claim that he should have been permitted to supplement the introduced portion of his statement, in which he admitted stabbing the victim in self-defense, with \his entire version of the events in its proper context\
  • “Generally stated, ‘opening the door’ to otherwise inadmissible evidence is a form of waiver that happens when one party’s use of inadmissible evidence justifies the opposing party’s rebuttal of that evidence with equally inadmissible proof.”
  • Crawford implicated when redacted confession of co-defendant explicitly used against defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Venters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.