Skip to main content

Morris v. State

Citations

  • 13 A.3d 1206
  • 418 Md. 194
  • 2011 Md. LEXIS 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s Confrontation Clause claim was “adequately, if not inarticulately preserved” for appellate review
  • addressing issues that were briefed so as to provide guidance for the trial court on remand
  • “The former point is cumulative evidence ... and so we consider it no further in our harm analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, C.J., Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Murphy, Adkins and Barbera

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.