Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Young

Citations

  • 162 A.3d 524
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 142
  • 2017 WL 1955301
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the officers were permitted to search the appellant “incident to the arrest or immediately prior to placing under arrest” because they had probable cause to arrest him for possession of a controlled substance
  • holding three officers’ approaching and questioning the defendant on a public street was a mere encounter
  • concluding the defendant’s admission to officers that he had marijuana gave police probable cause to arrest him for possession of a controlled substance
  • stating that “both the United States and Pennsylvania Supreme Courts have held that the approach of a police officer followed by questioning does not constitute a seizure.” (citation, brackets and quotation marks omitted)
  • approaching defendant and asking questions does not automatically constitute an investigatory detention
  • approaching defendant and asking questions does not automatically constitute an investigatory detention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Dubow, Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.