Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/16/1988
Commonwealth v. Stewart
Citations
- 374 Pa. Super. 256
- 542 A.2d 1010
- 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1574
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[u]nder the new DUI law, 3 defendants are given notice of the sentence enhancement effect of ARD”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olszewski, Popovich, Watkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-24· cited 120×
- Commonwealth v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-01· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-21· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. BeckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-10· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. BroughtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-12· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-17· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. ScheinertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-11· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. GodseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-26· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. FrostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-05-03· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-02· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. KornickiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-27· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. KopycinskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-30· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.