· 6/4/1991
Commonwealth v. Reeb
Citations
- 593 A.2d 853
- 406 Pa. Super. 28
- 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1507
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where certain things are specifically designated in a statute, all omissions should be understood as exclusions.”; citation omitted
- comments by the Supreme Court’s criminal rules committee are not binding, although those comments may be considered as effective aids in interpreting the meaning of the rule
- comments by the Supreme Court’s criminal rules committee are not binding, although those comments may be considered as effective aids in interpreting the meaning of the rule
- notice that ARD may enhance subsequent penalties not required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Olszewski, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.