Skip to main content
· 6/4/1991

Commonwealth v. Reeb

Citations

  • 593 A.2d 853
  • 406 Pa. Super. 28
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where certain things are specifically designated in a statute, all omissions should be understood as exclusions.”; citation omitted
  • comments by the Supreme Court’s criminal rules committee are not binding, although those comments may be considered as effective aids in interpreting the meaning of the rule
  • comments by the Supreme Court’s criminal rules committee are not binding, although those comments may be considered as effective aids in interpreting the meaning of the rule
  • notice that ARD may enhance subsequent penalties not required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Olszewski, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.