Commonwealth v. Spence

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Wiretap Act was violated where the informant’s consent was not reassessed after the initial period of consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Prisk
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-01-28· cited 268×
• Commonwealth v. Wingait Farms
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-08· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Darush
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-09-27· cited 3×
• Com. v. Lissmore, M.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-03-07· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Brantley
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2012-05-22

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Dugger
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-09· cited 417×
• Commonwealth v. Brachbill
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-06· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Adams
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-04-28· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Parrella
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-03· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Clark
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-06-06· cited 9×