Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/6/1988
Commonwealth v. Clark
Citations
- 374 Pa. Super. 308
- 542 A.2d 1036
- 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1938
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming suppression where the DA’s designee “did not meet with or speak to [the informant prior to obtaining his consent for each new period of surveillance”
- affirming suppression where the DA’s designee “did not meet with or speak to [the informant prior to obtaining his consent for each new period of surveillance”
- proper remedy where recordings fell outside time frame of consent and authorization was suppression
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feeney, Hester, Sole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.