Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Adams

Citations

  • 524 A.2d 1375
  • 362 Pa. Super. 549
  • 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that section 5704(2)(ii) does not “set forth a specific length of time during which a consent remains viable.”
  • approving procedure whereby the attorney general interviewed the informant to ensure continued voluntary consent for each authorized period of interceptions
  • approving procedure whereby the attorney general interviewed the informant to ensure continued voluntary consent for each authorized period of interceptions
  • approving of a procedure where a deputy attorney general conducted a telephone interview with an informant to determine the voluntariness of his consent to a second ten-day period of interceptions
  • per Section 1902, the trial court “was not free to attach such significance to the presence or absence of an ‘s’ at the end of the word ‘communication’”
  • a court may not conclude that a word in a statute shall be construed in the singular or plural merely because of “the presence or absence of an ‘s’ at the end of ... [such] word”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosky, Sole, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.