Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/19/2012
Commonwealth v. Smith
Citations
- 47 A.3d 862
- 2012 Pa. Super. 126
- 2012 WL 2308253
- 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1053
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering Rule 404(b) analysis when determining whether evidence in one case would be admissible in another for purposes of consolidation of separate informations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender, Colville, Wecht
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-13· cited 237×
- Commonwealth v. StrunkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-09· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. KeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-12· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. NewmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-07· cited 87×
- Commonwealth v. FinkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-08· cited 87×
- In the Interest of F.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-15· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-03-16· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. PowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-16· cited 14×
- Boykin v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-02-15· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.