Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Patterson

Citations

  • 399 A.2d 123
  • 484 Pa. 374
  • 1979 Pa. LEXIS 518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the requirement of an “identical modus operandi is not required under the common plan or scheme exception”
  • noting that the victims were of totally different ages
  • footnotes and quotation marks omitted, numbering altered for clarity, and numbering brackets altered for consistency
  • in rape prosecution, admission of prior rape by defendant, held, error where dissimilarities between the two crimes included the weapon used, locales, disguise of assailant, use of violence
  • in rape prosecution, admission of prior rape by defendant, held, error where dissimilarities between the two crimes included the weapon used, locales, disguise of assailant, use of violence
  • “Because of the dissimilarities, we are not - 14 - J-S24010-23 persuaded a nearly identical method or a common scheme, plan, or design was established.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Manderino, Larsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.