Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Newman

Citations

  • 598 A.2d 275
  • 528 Pa. 393
  • 1991 Pa. LEXIS 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that - 12 - J-S17033-17 consolidation was proper even where there was a lapse of 18 months between the two offenses
  • stating that a commonality of roles and location of crime establishes a common design and that the court must examine shared details
  • stating that the establishment of a common scheme, plan or design “requires only that there are shared similarities in the details of each crime.”
  • allowing introduction of evidence of another crime in spite of an eighteen-month gap between the two offenses
  • allowing introduction of evidence of another crime in spite of an eighteen-month gap between the two offenses
  • stating that a commonality of roles and situs establishes a common design

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.