Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hawkins

Citations

  • 953 A.2d 1248
  • 598 Pa. 85
  • 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is the petitioner’s burden to allege and prove the applicability of a timeliness exception
  • noting that testimony offered at a public sentencing hearing was a matter of public record ascertainable in the exercise of due diligence
  • stating that when a petitioner invokes the governmental interference exception of 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545(b)(1)(i), the petitioner must demonstrate due diligence in obtaining the facts at issue
  • regarding newly-discovered facts related to the investigation into the murder for which Davis was convicted
  • petitioner must “plead and prove that the failure to previously raise these claims was the result of interference by government officials”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Madame, Greenspan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.